Evidence index · record
Status: Ten selected reference families checked at the report's bounded claim scope.
Historical research report citation log
Checked: August 15, 2026
Scope: selected references and the exact bounded claims made in the preserved Version 0.5 report
Not claimed: systematic-review completeness, universal causation, validation of A3, or verification of every pointer in the two underlying deep-research reviews
Reference checks
| ID | Report reference | Authoritative locator checked | Bounded claim fit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR01 | Colloca & Miller (2011), nocebo | PubMed PMID 21862825, PMCID PMC3167012, DOI 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182294a50 |
Supports the bounded clinical claim that negative expectations and the content/presentation of information can contribute to adverse symptom experience and reporting. It does not support a universal grammar claim. | PASS |
| CR02 | Benedetti et al. (2006), hyperalgesic nocebo | PMC full record, PMID 17108175, DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2947-06.2006 |
Supports a mechanistic nocebo example in a bounded experimental pain context. The report uses it only as support for the premise, not for form-specific causation. | PASS |
| CR03 | CDC CERC manual | CDC CERC Manual | The official framework expressly addresses crisis-message principles, audience understanding and acceptance, and evidence-based emergency communication practice. The report’s trust/comprehension/response summary stays at that guidance level. | PASS |
| CR04 | WHO emergency risk-communication guideline (2017) | PubMed PMID 31059213, NCBI Bookshelf NBK540729 | The WHO guideline identifies context, trust, risk perception, risk-reduction behavior, and evidence-based emergency communication practice. The report makes no claim beyond that public-health scope. | PASS |
| CR05 | Witte (1992), Extended Parallel Process Model | DOI 10.1080/03637759209376276; bibliographic record: Communication Monographs 59(4), 329–349 |
Establishes the threat/efficacy model used by the report. The report pairs this theoretical source with the later meta-analysis rather than treating the model alone as outcome proof. | PASS |
| CR06 | Witte & Allen (2000), fear-appeal meta-analysis | PubMed PMID 11009129, DOI 10.1177/109019810002700506 |
The abstract directly distinguishes high-efficacy danger-control effects from low-efficacy defensive responses. This supports the report’s bounded persuasion summary. | PASS |
| CR07 | Buzan, Wæver & de Wilde (1998), securitization | University of Copenhagen record; publisher record | Confirms the cited book and its operational distinction between securitization and politicization. The report’s sentence is a bounded summary of the book’s speech-act, audience-acceptance, and extraordinary-measures account. | PASS |
| CR08 | LeDoux & Pine (2016), two-system framework | PubMed PMID 27609244, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030353 |
The paper distinguishes conscious fear/anxiety feelings from defensive behavioral and physiological responses. The report’s consequence—that language cannot be assumed to map directly onto physiological threat behavior—is appropriately framed as a project implication. | PASS |
| CR09 | Aquinas, Summa Theologiae II-II q.19 | New Advent text, Question 19 | The text expressly distinguishes filial, initial, servile, and worldly fear. The report presents it as a Christian/Western illustration, not universal theology. | PASS |
| CR10 | Rudolf Otto, The Idea of the Holy | Historical locator retained in report; independent corroborating account: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | Supports the illustrative distinction between numinous awe/dread and ordinary fear. The report does not quote Otto or generalize the account as universal theology. | PASS |
Link and claim result
- Ten of ten selected reference families have an identified authoritative or scholarly record and a bounded claim disposition.
- Publisher or journal anti-bot responses do not create a source gap where PubMed, PMC, official agency, university, publisher, or stable DOI metadata independently establishes the record.
- The Benedetti reference’s stable DOI is recorded here because the historical page URL exposes the journal volume/page but the preserved report body does not print the DOI.
- No citation check in the preserved report requires a wording repair to its historical body.
- The current-status preface makes no new scholarly claim; it records publication chronology and the governed public-tool boundary.
Relationship to first-book source closure
The six first-book flags S01–S06 are closed separately in SOURCE_AND_CITATION_CLOSURE_LOG_2026-08-15.md. This report log does not duplicate or rewrite that chronology. Together, the two logs leave zero named source or citation checks open in the current release evidence lane.
[read/checked: PubMed/PMC records; official CDC and WHO records; University of Copenhagen and publisher records; primary Aquinas text; stable DOI metadata; bounded report sentences]
Open the exact raw Markdown source (5,519 bytes; SHA-256 25afab692f44cd8be8161e4e0c1900fd65711e0dd9e0518064ef984678ae2093).